MEALNA has strong expertise in conducting evaluations across all types of humanitarian and development projects, applying standard indicators and internationally recognized methodologies.
Our evaluation work covers baseline, midline, and endline assessments, enabling a clear comparison between initial conditions and achieved results to mea
MEALNA has strong expertise in conducting evaluations across all types of humanitarian and development projects, applying standard indicators and internationally recognized methodologies.
Our evaluation work covers baseline, midline, and endline assessments, enabling a clear comparison between initial conditions and achieved results to measure impact and effectiveness.
We apply standard humanitarian and development indicators, such as Food Consumption Score (FCS), Coping Strategy Index (CSI), Global Acute Malnutrition (GAM), access to safe water, service coverage rates, and beneficiary satisfaction levels — ensuring reliable, comparable, and evidence-based findings.
All evaluations are designed and implemented in line with OECD-DAC criteria — including Relevance, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact, Sustainability, and Coherence — providing comprehensive insights that support learning, accountability, and strategic decision-making
Research questions and develop MEALNA has extensive experience in monitoring humanitarian and development projects across all sectors, ensuring compliance with international standards and accountability frameworks.
Our expertise covers Health, Nutrition, WASH, Food Security and Livelihoods, Education, Protection, and Development, including
Research questions and develop MEALNA has extensive experience in monitoring humanitarian and development projects across all sectors, ensuring compliance with international standards and accountability frameworks.
Our expertise covers Health, Nutrition, WASH, Food Security and Livelihoods, Education, Protection, and Development, including rehabilitation works, cash and in-kind assistance, agricultural projects, and community resilience programs.
We also monitor cross-cutting themes such as gender equality, safeguarding, child protection, and accountability to affected populations, in addition to capacity-building and training activities.
All monitoring activities are guided by internationally recognized standards such as the Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS), Sphere Standards, and OECD-DAC criteria, ensuring that findings are credible, actionable, and aligned with global best practices
MEALNA has extensive experience in assessing and strengthening accountability systems within humanitarian and development programs. Our work covers all components of accountability — ensuring that organizations are transparent, responsive, and inclusive in their engagement with affected populations.
We conduct comprehensive accountability
MEALNA has extensive experience in assessing and strengthening accountability systems within humanitarian and development programs. Our work covers all components of accountability — ensuring that organizations are transparent, responsive, and inclusive in their engagement with affected populations.
We conduct comprehensive accountability system assessments, examining:
• Information sharing — evaluating how effectively key project information is communicated to communities.
• Community participation — assessing the extent to which communities are engaged in the design, implementation, and evaluation of programs.
• Feedback and complaint mechanisms — reviewing the functionality, accessibility, and responsiveness of feedback and complaint handling systems.
• Learning and continuous improvement — analyzing how organizations use feedback and monitoring data to improve program quality and adapt interventions.
• Governance and oversight systems — evaluating internal governance, leadership accountability, and the effectiveness of monitoring and decision-making structures.
Through this integrated approach, MEALNA helps organizations build robust accountability frameworks that align with the Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS), the IASC Accountability Framework, and other international best practices.
Our assessments not only measure compliance but also provide practical recommendations for strengthening institutional culture, transparency, and two-way communication between organizations and communities